Tuning Up ADO.NET Connection Pooling in ASP.NET Applications |
By Dmitri Khanine |
Connection Pooling Basics |
Opening a database connection is a resource intensive and time consuming operation. Connection pooling increases the performance of Web applications by reusing active database connections instead of creating a new connection with every request. Connection pool manager maintains a pool of open database connections. When a new connection requests come in, the pool manager checks if the pool contains any unused connections and returns one if available. If all connections currently in the pool are busy and the maximum pool size has not been reached, the new connection is created and added to the pool. When the pool reaches its maximum size all new connection requests are being queued up until a connection in the pool becomes available or the connection attempt times out.Connection pooling behavior is controlled by the connection string parameters. The following are four parameters that control most of the connection pooling behavior:
|
Common Problems and Resolutions |
Connection pooling problems are almost always caused by a “connection leak” – a condition where your application does not close its database connections correctly and consistently. When you “leak” connections, they remain open until the garbage collector (GC) closes them for you by calling their Dispose method. Unlike old ADO, ADO.NET requires you to manually close your database connections as soon as you’re done with them. If you think of relying on connection objects to go out of scope, think again. It may take hours until GC collects them. In the mean time your app may be dead in the water, greeting your users or support personnel with something like this:
|
Closing your connections |
When you intend to close your database connection, you want to make sure that you are really closing it. The following code looks fine yet causes a connection leak:
Did you notice that in the first example we called conn.Close() explicitly while in the second one we make the compiler generate an (implicit) call to conn.Dispose() immediately following the using block? The C# using block guarantees that the Dispose method is called on the subject of the using clause immediately after the block ends. Close and Dispose methods of Connection object are equivalent. Neither one gives you any specific advantages over the other. When returning a connection from a class method – make sure you cache it locally and call its Close method. The following code will leak a connection: OleDbCommand cmd new OleDbCommand(myUpdateQuery, getConnection()); intres = cmd.ExecuteNonQuery(); getConnection().Close(); // The connection returned from the first call to getConnection() is not being closed. Instead of closing your connection, this line creates a new one and tries to close it. If you use SqlDataReader, OleDbDataReader, etc., close them. Even though closing the connection itself seems to do the trick, put in the extra effort to close your data reader objects explicitly when you use them. Last but not the least, never Close or Dispose your connection or any other managed object in the class destructor or your Finalize method. This not only has no value in closing your connections but also interferes with the garbage collector and may cause errors. For more information see http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/cpguide/html/cpconprogrammingessentialsforgarbagecollection.asp. |
Testing your changes |
The only way to know the effect of your changes on connection pooling behavior is to load-test your application. If you have existing unit tests – use them. Running your unit tests repeatedly in a loop may create a fair bit of stress on application. If you don’t, use the Web load testing tool. There are plenty of commercial load testing tools on the market. If you prefer freeware, consider OpenSTA available at www.opensta.org. All you need to setup your load test is to install the tool, bring up your Web application and click your way through. OpenSTA will record your HTTP requests into test scenarios that you can run as part of your load test.Knowing that your application crashes under the load doesn’t often help to locate the problem. If the app crashes fairly quickly, all you may need to do is run several load tests – one for each module and see which one has a problem. However, if it takes hours to crash you will have to take a closer look. |
Monitoring connection pooling behavior |
Most of the time you just need to know if your application manages to stay within the size of its connection pool. If the load doesn’t change, but the number of connections constantly creep even after the initial “warm-up” period, you are most likely dealing with a connection leak. The easiest way to monitor the number of database connections is by using the Performance Monitor available under Administrative tools on most Windows installations. If you are running SQL Server, add SQL Server General Statistics -> User Connections performance counter (The counter is available on the SQL Server machine so you may need to put its name or IP address into the Select Counters From Computer box). The other way to monitor the number of database connections is by querying your DBMS. For example, on SQL Server run:
In documentation you may run into .Net CLR Data performance counters. They are great if you know what they can and cannot do. Keep in mind that they do not always reset properly. The following KB article sheds some light on the problem but in my opinion does not cover all the issues: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;314429. Another thing to keep in mind is that IIS unloads app domains under stress so don’t be surprised when your number of database connections has dropped to zero while your min pool size is five! |
Conclusion |
In this article you’ve learned that the most common cause of connection pooling issues is database connections that are left open or not closed properly. You’ve learned that when you type “conn.Close()”, you almost always want to put that in the “Finally” block. You also learned not to interfere with the class destructor unless you use unmanaged resources. You’ve learned how to monitor your connection pool and diagnose a potential problem. You also learned how to keep a system with a connection leak in production if you really have to, until the problem is resolved. I hope this article has helped you resolve your connection pooling issue. However, there is more to connection pooling that is not covered in this article. Check out Bill Vaughn’s “Swimming in the .NET connection pool” at http://www.winnetmag.com/Article/ArticleID/38356/38356.html. |
About the Author |
Dmitri Khanine is senior web developer and architect working for a major Canadian Bank. His 10+ years of experience are mostly in backend and middle tier development of enterprise Web applications on Microsoft as well as J2EE platforms. Industry experience includes Banking, Finance, Automotive and software consulting. Dmitri’s areas of interest and expertise include rapid enterprise application development, MVC frameworks and code generation. Dmitri can be contacted at Khanine@hotmail.com. |
Tag Cloud
.NET AJAX ArcGIS ASP.Net ASP.Net 2.0 ATLAS Code Snippets Delphi Exchange Fun Google IIS Internet Linux Microsoft Mobile MySQL Networking News Office365 Online Services Open Source Outlook Personal PHP PowerShell Security Serviços web SharePoint software SQL SQL Server SSL Tips & tricks Transact-SQL Tutorials Uncategorized Utils Visual Studio Web Web 2.0 Windows 7 Windows server Windows Vista wordpressCategories
Contact